Showing posts with label Lynn Public Schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lynn Public Schools. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Lynn School Committee Parameters Per the City Charter

In the November 13th edition of the Lynn Daily Item, it was mentioned in regard to a discussion about overcrowding at Ford Elementary and other schools that

"...Latham and Ford are primarily responsible for sorting out Ford's problems. [Mayor Judith Flanagan Kennedy] reminded [the School Committee] that the City Charter includes a committee prohibition barring "interference in administration."
This leads to the question: what else does the City Charter dictate as far as the Lynn School Committee is concerned? See below for Article 4 of the Lynn City Charter which is specific to the School Committee.


ARTICLE 4 - SCHOOL COMMITTEE

Section 4-1     Composition; Eligibility; Term of Office

(a)     Composition--The school committee shall consist of the mayor, who shall be chairman, and, six members elected at large.

(b)     Eligibility--Any voter shall be eligible to hold the office of school committee member.

(c)     Term of Office--The term of office of school committee members shall be for two years beginning the first Monday in January following their election, and until their successors are qualified.

Section 4-2     Officers of the School Committee
   
The committee shall organize biennially on the first Monday in January, and shall elect one of its members vice chairman, whose duty it shall be to preside in the absence of the mayor.

Section 4-3     General Powers and Duties
   
The school committee, in addition to the powers and duties conferred and imposed by law on school committees, shall have power to:

(a)     Elect a superintendent of schools, and may, subject to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint, suspend or remove at pleasure such subordinate officers of assistants, including custodians of school buildings, as it may deem necessary for the proper discharge of its duties and the conduct of its business;

(b)     Define the term of service, the duties and fix the compensation of all officers and employees appointed by it;

(c)     Provide, when they are necessary, temporary accommodations for school purposes;

(d)     Make all repairs, the expenditure for which are made from the regular appropriation for the school department, except as is otherwise provided herein, or by statute;

(e)     Control all school buildings and the ground connected therewith;

(f)     Make all reasonable rules and regulations, not inconsistent with any laws of the commonwealth, for the management of the public schools of the city and for conducting the business of the schools.

Section 4-4     Sites for School Buildings
   
No site for a school building shall be acquired or designated, no plans for the construction or alteration of a school building shall be accepted, or work thereon begin, and no furnishings or equipment shall be purchased or installed, by the city, without first having obtained in each case the approval of the school committee signified by order.

(a)     Appointment--No member of the school committee, except the mayor, shall, during the term for which he is elected, hold any other office or position, the compensation for which is payable out of the city treasury, nor shall such person be eligible to hold any such office or position until two years following the expiration of such term. This provision shall not prevent a city officer or city employee who has taken a leave of absence from such office or employment from resuming his duties as such following such service as a school committee member.

(b)     Interference in Administration--No member of the school committee, nor any sub-committee of the school committee, shall, directly or indirectly, attempt to take any part in the conduct of the administrative business of the school department.

Section 4-6     Exercise of Powers
   
(a)     In General--Unless otherwise provided by general law, or by the charter, the power of the school committee may be exercised in the manner determined by it.

(b)     Quorum--The presence of four members of the school committee shall constitute a quorum. The affirmative votes of four members shall be necessary to adopt any order, resolution or other formal vote, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time.

(c)     Meetings to be Public--All meetings of the school committee, and of every sub-committee thereof, shall at all times be open to the public and to the press, unless otherwise authorized by law.

Section 4-7     Budget Hearing
   
At least thirty days before the meeting at which the school committee is to vote on the budget request which it will submit to the mayor for inclusion in the budget he is required to submit to the city council, the school committee shall cause to be published in a local newspaper a general summary of its proposed budget. The summary shall indicate specifically areas of increase from the current budget, if any, and the reasons for such changes. The notice shall further state (1) the times and places where complete copies of the preliminary budget proposal are available for examination by the public, and (2) the date, not less than seven nor more than fourteen days following such publication, the time and the place at which a public hearing will be held by the school committee on its budget proposal.

The action of the school committee in adopting the budget, following the public hearing shall be summarized and the results of a roll call vote taken on each amendment to the proposed budget as may be offered shall be recorded.

Section 4-8     Mayor to be Coordinator
   
The mayor shall be responsible for the effective coordination of all activities of the school department with the activities of all other city agencies. He shall transmit all requests of the school committee, which require action by the city council to the city council, and he shall, at the request of the city council, provide it with such information concerning such requests as may be necessary or desirable.

Section 4-9     Vacancies
   
If a vacancy shall occur in the office of school committee member it shall be filled in the same manner as is provided in Section 3-12 for the filling of vacancies in the office of city councillor at large.


Citation: http://www.ci.lynn.ma.us/cityhall_citycharter.shtml


You may also be interested in:

Monday, November 12, 2012

Public Forum on New Marshall Middle School (Lynn, MA): 11/14/12

There will be a public forum on the Marshall Middle School building project on Wednesday, November 14, 2012 in the Marshall cafeteria (19 Porter St); the forum will begin at 7:00pm

Monday, November 5, 2012

Lynn School Committee Meeting: 11/8/12

The next Lynn School Committee meeting  is scheduled for Thursday, November 8 at 7:00pm (*a policy sub-committee meeting is scheduled for 6:15pm). SC meetings take place at 90 Commercial Street.

Items on the agenda include:

-Ford School space issues (Mrs. Coppola)

For the full agenda, see: http://www.lynnschools.org/documents/district/school_committee/2012_notices/SC%20-%2011-8-12%20notice%20&%20agenda.pdf

Monday, October 22, 2012

Lynn School Business to be Discussed at this Week's City Council Meeting: 10/23/12

At the Lynn City Council meeting to be held Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Lynn Superintendent Catherine Latham will give a presentation regarding potential funding for the new Marshall Middle School.


The City Council Meeting will begin at 8:00pm in the Council Chambers at Lynn City Hall.

Lynn School Committee Meeting: 10/25/12

The next Lynn School Committee meeting  is scheduled for Thursday October 25, 2012 at 7:00pm. SC meetings take place at 90 Commercial Street.

Items on the agenda include:

-Visitor Policy - Officer Ferrari and Richard Iarrobino
-Discussion of the site of the new Thurgood Marshall Middle School
-Enrollment Report - October 1, 2012

Friday, October 19, 2012

The Level 4 List: EJ Harrington and Wm Connery Elementary Schools (Lynn)

CONNERY

The Connery Elementary School in Lynn, which serves approximately 600 students in grades Pre-K through 5, was named to the state's Level 4 school list in January 2010. Connery's student population is just over two-thirds Hispanic; the low income population has ranged from 91.9 to 93.7% since 2007-08 while the Limited English proficiency population has ranged between 43.6 and 63.7%. In 2011-12, 77.1% of students spoke English as a second language (Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education).

On the 2009 MCAS exam, 11% of students overall were proficient or advanced in English Language Arts (ELA) while 24% were proficient or better in math. In 2006, just 19% of 3rd grade students achieved either  a proficient or advanced score on the reading exam. Before Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) was phased out  due to the No Child Left Behind waiver granted to Massachusetts in 2012, Connery had not met AYP at the aggregate or subgroup level in ELA from 2004 through 2010. Additionally, in 2008-09 students missed an average of 7.6 days of school and the attendance rate was 95.4%.

Since being designated a Level 4 school, proficiency rates on the MCAS exams at Connery has improved steadily in both ELA and math. Below are the percentage of students who were proficient or better on each section of the exam from 2009 - 2012.

2009201020112012
ELA11%17%29%28%
Math24%19%31%34%

In 2012, the percentage of students in ELA receiving a 'Warning/Failing' grade decreased 9 percentage points while the percentage of students receiving a score in this range in math decreased 13 percentage points. On the math exam, the percentage of students receiving an 'Advanced' score (those between 260 and 280) doubled from 5% in 2011 to 10% in 2012. Further:
  • The percentage of students 'Advanced' in ELA increased 2 percentage points from 1% in 2011 to 3% in 2012.
  • The percentage of students with a 'Needs Improvement' score in ELA increased 10 percentage points from the previous year.
  • The percentage of students who were not proficient in math ('Needs Improvement' or 'Warning/Failure' combined) decreased two percentage points (69% in 2011; 67% in 2012).
In terms of its Cumulative Progress and Performance Index (CPPI), Connery met all of its state-mandated goals at the aggregate and subgroup levels this year. In regard to the CPI, which is a score given to assess a subgroup, school or district's progress toward 100% proficiency, Connery had an overall score of 69.4 in ELA and 70.5 in math; scores range from 0 - 100 with 100 denoting that all students are proficient. In 2012, the school was in the 13th percentile relative to schools serving common grades.

The attendance rate and average number of absences at Connery has remained consistent and in the same range over the last few years. Out of school suspensions were down 1.3 points in 2011-12 from 2010-11.

08-0909-1010-1111-12
Avg. # Absences8.07.97.67.2
Attendance Rate95.3%95.2%95.5%95.6%




HARRINGTON

The Harrington Elementary School in Lynn, which serves approximately 640 students also in grades Pre-K through 5, was named to the state's Level 4 school list in 2010 along with Connery. Harrington's student population is just over two-thirds Hispanic/Latino; the low income population has ranged from 86 to 90.9% since 2005-06 while the Limited English proficiency population has ranged between 32.9 and 56.2%. In 2011-12, 66.5% of students spoke English as a second language (Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education).

On the 2009 MCAS exam, 16% of students overall were proficient or advanced in English Language Arts (ELA) while 11% were proficient or better in math. This was a decrease from the previous year when 19% were proficient or better in ELA and 20% in math. Before Adequate Yearly Progress was phased out, Harrington had not made AYP at either the aggregate or subgroup levels in both ELA and math from 2007 to 2009. Additionally, in 2008-09 students missed an average of 10.6 days of school and the attendance rate was 93.6%.

Since being designated a Level 4 school, proficiency rates on the MCAS exams at Harrington improved from 2009 to 2011; proficiency rates remained the same in 2012 from the previous year. Below are the percentage of students who were proficient or better on each section of the exam from 2009 - 2012.

2009201020112012
ELA16%21%35%35%
Math11%21%35%35%

In 2012, the percentage of students in ELA receiving a 'Warning/Failing' grade increased 2 percentage points while the percentage of students receiving a score in this range in math also increased 2 percentage points from 2011. The school was also in the 80th percentile for ELL/former ELL students on the 5th grade science exam; the percentage of students achieving an 'Advanced' score in science nearly doubled from 2011 to 2012. Further:
  • The percentage of students 'Advanced' in ELA remained the same from 2011 to 2012 while the percentage of students 'Advanced' in math decreased by 2 percentage points.
  • The percentage of students 'Proficient' in math has increased 19 percentage points from 2009.
  • The percentage of students in 2008 who were 'Advanced' or 'Proficient' in science was 2%; this number was 33% in 2012.
In terms of its Cumulative Progress and Performance Index (CPPI), Harrington met all of its goals at the aggregate and subgroup levels this year. In regard to the CPI, Harrington has an overall score of 68.8 in ELA and 67.8 in math. In 2012, the school was in the 19th percentile relative to schools serving common grades.

Test scores are not the only area that has improved at Harrington. The attendance rate has increased and the average number of absences has decreased since 2008-09.

08-0909-1010-1111-12
Avg. # Absences10.68.78.18.1
Attendance Rate93.6%94.8%95.1%95.1%


If both schools meet all of the requirements, Connery and Harrington could exit Level 4 status at the end of the 2012-13 school year.



Citation: www.doe.mass.edu 


You may also be interested in:

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Public Meeting Regarding New Marshall Site/Construction Set for Next Week

There is a public meeting regarding the building of the new Marshall Middle School scheduled for next week. The meeting will focus on the design and site of the proposed new school building.

Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Time: 7pm
Location: Marshall Middle School cafeteria, 19 Porter Street

Monday, October 8, 2012

Lynn's Connery Elementary Featured in The Boston Globe

Connery Elementary, which was labeled a Level 4 school in 2010, was featured in the October 6th edition of The Boston Globe. The article discusses the school's turnaround over the last few years.

Once failing, Lynn's Connery scores gains on 2012 MCAS

From 2010 to 2012, Connery's English language arts proficiency rates have increased from 17% to 28% and math proficiency rates from 19% to 34%.


You may also be interested in:

Lynn School Committee Meeting: 10/11/12

The next Lynn School Committee meeting  is scheduled for Thursday October 11, 2012 at 5:30pm. SC meetings take place at 90 Commercial Street.

There is a single item on this week's agenda: 

-Unfinished Business: School Committee Goals


Thursday, September 27, 2012

LPS: Achievement Gap in 3rd Grade Reading

Here it was noted that there was a 29-point difference in 3rd grade reading proficiency rates between low income and non-low income students in the Lynn public school system. Below are the proficiency rates at this level by school; all numbers are in percentages. The positive or negative numbers in parentheses indicates the difference from the individual school's overall proficiency rate. In 2012, 41% of 3rd grade students citywide scored proficient or higher on the reading exam.

*N/A - Data is not reported for sample sizes less than 10.
**No data at the individual grade levels was reported for Washington

Low IncomeNon-Low Income
Aborn56 (-16)90 (+18)
Brickett39 (-4)54 (+11)
Callahan31 (-4)53 (+18)
Cobbet24 (-2)N/A
Connery23 (-12)N/A
Drewicz46 (0)N/A
Ford31 (0)N/A
Harrington28 (+3)10 (-15)
Hood 47 (-5)70 (+18)
Ingalls39 (-1)N/A
Lincoln-Thomson42 (-11)80 (+27)
Lynn Woods20 (-28)65 (+17)
Sewell Anderson42 (-4)60 (+14)
Shoemaker36 (-15)61 (+10)
Sisson71 (-5)82 (+6)
Tracy22 (-6)N/A
Washington**N/AN/A

The school with the largest gap between low income and non-low income students was Lynn Woods (45 points) while the school with the smallest gap was Sisson (11 points). Harrington was the only school were low income students had a higher proficiency rate than non-low income students.

For low income students, Aborn, Drewicz, Hood, Lincoln-Thomson, Sewall Anderson and Sisson all had higher proficiency rates than the city's overall 3rd grade reading proficiency rate. The proficiency rate specifically for low income students in Lynn as a whole was 36% (a 5-point difference from the aggregate).

All of the schools with available data except Harrington had a higher proficiency rate than the city for the non-low income subgroup. This figure was 65% just for non-low income students.

Citation: www.doe.mass.edu

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Full Lynn MCAS Score Breakdown by Subgroup

On the 2012 MCAS, the Lynn Public School system's scores were distributed in the following way (all numbers are in percentages):


Adv.Prof.NIW
ELA7433317
Math12283426

Key
Adv. = Advanced (scores 260 - 280)
Prof. = Proficient (scores 240 - 259)
NI = Needs Improvement (scores 220 - 239)
W = Warning/Failure (scores 200 - 219)



The distribution of scores, however, varied depending on the subgroup. See below for ELA breakdown by subgroup for the city.


Adv.Prof.NIW
Students w/ Disabilities 0  1633 50
High Needs5403520

ELL 013 4641
Former ELL 344 39 13

Low Income 541 35 19
Non-Low Income 1651 22 10
Title I6 42 34 17
Non-Title I 2153 11 15

Afr Amer/Black 742 32 19
Asian 843 36 12
Hispanic/Latino4 38 37 21
Multi-Race,Non-Hisp/Lat.10 47 26 17
White14 52 24 11

Male 539 34 21
Female9 46 31 13

Based on the Cumulative Performance Indices (CPI), LPS performed better than the state in the  African American, Hispanic/Latino, Title I  and ELL/Former ELL (combined) subgroup categories. Here we see that Female students performed better than Males with a higher percentage in the advanced and proficient categories. Additionally, this data indicates that half of all Students with Disabilities received a 'Warning/Failing' grade on the ELA exam. Not surpprisingly, the breakdowns differed at the individual school level. At Cobbet, for example, 33% of African American students were proficient (excluding the advanced category) in ELA while 82% were proficient at Aborn. At Classical, 91% of Non-Low Income students achieved an advanced or proficient score.

In 3rd Grade Reading, which has been pinpointed as a marker for future academic success, 58% of White students were proficient or better while 41% of African American/Black students, 40% of Asian students, 32% of Hispanic/Latino students were proficient or better.  There was a 29% difference between Low Income and Non-Low Income students at this level (36% vs. 65%).



Below is the breakdown for Math by subgroup.

Adv.Prof.NIW
Students w/ Disabilities  18 25 65
High Needs9 25 36 30

ELL2 13 35 50
Former ELL 9 3038 22

Low Income 926 3629
Non-Low Income 2135 27 17
Title I 1127 36 27
Non-Title I 2833 17 22

Afr Amer/Black 923 34 34
Asian 2033 31 17
Hispanic/Latino8 24 37 31
Multi-Race,Non-Hisp/Lat.17 24 32 27
White17 35 30 18

Male12 27 33 29
Female12 28 36 24

According to the CPIs, Lynn did better than the state in the Hispanic/Latino subgroup and the Title I subgroup. Unlike the ELA portion of the exam, Males and Females performed equally on the math exam. Math scores also varied by school such that 0% of Asian students at Ford received a 'Warning/Failing' grade while 11% of Asian students at Drewicz fell into this category. At the middle school level, 46% of Low Income students were proficient or higher in math while this statistic was 34% at Pickering and 17% at Marshall.

    Citation: www.doe.mass.edu